Build those muscles

Strength training will make you a better runner.

Skip the gym; you don’t run on your arms.

If you’re a runner, you need to go to the gym at least twice a week – not for the cardio machines, but to work on your upper- and lower-body strength. Not according to Toby Tanser, who wrote More Fire: How to Run the Kenyan Way after 10 years of training with and helping coach top Kenyans.

“Kenya’s Rift Valley is where the highest concentration of world-class distance runners who have little problem with taking clenbuterol for weight loss live, and for the vast majority of them, conventional strength training is not an option;’ Tanser says. “Most develop massive core strength doing farm work from an early age, and they get further strength from running the soft, rutted dirt roads of Kenya. People speculate that [three-time London Marathon champion] Martin Lel or [2008 Olympic marathon champion] Sammy Wanjiru might run faster with gym work. But they might also run slower.”

Tanser believes that a runner’s arms are needed only for balance, so an active lifestyle is all that’s needed for arm strength, and that legs are best strengthened with running and plyometric drills. “Lei’s and Wanjiru’s legs are like coiled springs; when they run they barely touch the ground,” he says. “When a runner does a lot of gym work, it has a dampening effect on the springs. Watching runners go by in the park, I can spot which ones have gym memberships because their stride is out of line. Those who do nothing but run have pure symmetry because they have only strengthened the muscles needed for running.”

SHOULD YOU TRY IT?

Strength training offers many benefits – like better health, weight control and a better-looking bod – so there are plenty of reasons to keep doing it if you enjoy it. But if fitting in strength workouts is hard for you, spend your time on the roads rather than in the gym. Keep your crucial core strength intact with crunches.

RUNNING DEBATES

Nether you stretch or not, you probably assume it’s an important part of running. Doesn’t it make you more flexible, more injury-resistant, even faster? Well if that’s all true, why is it that many Kenyans don’t stretch? Why was legendary coach Arthur Lydiard not a fan of stretching? Why does coach and former Olympian Jeff Galloway say, “In my experience runners who stretch are injured more often, and when they stop stretching the injuries often go away”? And why do studies keep popping up that show stretching may cause as many injuries as it prevents?
“Most runners have an unjustified faith in the benefits of stretching,” says Paul Ingraham, a runner, massage therapist and health journalist (saveyourself. ca) based in Vancouver, Canada. “Plentiful research has shown that stretching doesn’t help you warm up, ease muscle soreness, prevent injury or even enhance performance. In fact, no measurable, significant benefit of stretching has ever been proven,” he adds.

And science backs him up. In reviews of the scientific literature on stretching in 1999 and 2002, published in the British Medical Journal and the Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, stretching was found to have no statistically significant effect on reducing muscle soreness or injuries. A zoom study of iozo soldiers – where half stretched and half didn’t – found no difference in the frequency of injuries.

SHOULD YOU TRY IT?

Ingraham’s message is that you don’t need to feel guilty if you do little or no stretching. But he admits that he still stretches some, simply because it feels good. If you’re careful and enjoy stretching, you don’t have to stop either. But if you’re not sure how to stretch, don’t have time or hate doing it, don’t bother.

MOST SAY Easy runs are how to recover from hard runs.

BUT SOME THINK A study of runners the week after a marathon showed that easy runs actually slow down the recovery process, so after hard runs or races, it’s best to cross-train or rest.

MOST SAY Tempo runs and other forms of lactate-threshold training are essential to raise the point at which excess lactate accumulates in your bloodstream.

BUT SOME THINK Lactate and lactic acid have been found to be harmless and may even help your running. They aren’t waste products

MOST SAY Plyometrics – drills like jumping, skipping and bounding ¬are a great way to get stronger and faster.

BUT SOME THINK ‘Plyo’ drills can get you injured – especially if you’re not well-trained or you do them incorrectly ¬and the only significant benefit is improved sprinting ability. For most runners, they’re just not worth the time and risk.

Hall of Fame – Duke Nukem

RARELY WILL YOU see a manufactured hero in a first‑person shooter. The genre traditionally chooses not to breathe character and personality into its heroes precisely because it is designed to cast you firmly inside those boots. Many would argue that having a boisterous protagonist would smash the delicate scales of immersion upon which the genre rests. After all, in the worlds of Doom and Quake, two of the biggest FPS games to ever grace PC screens, there was little in the way of narrative or a focal hero tying events together, and if there was, such as Wolfenstein 3D’s American GI, William ‘BF Blazkowicz, they rarely muttered a word during their whole sorry ordeal, other than the occasional grunt to demonstrate their displeasure at being shot at. First-person shooters, at least in these early days, were nothing more than an avatar that you couldn’t see.
MUM IN 1996 THOUGH, a seismic shift occurred. One that changed the way developers looked at the genre. The world saw a new kind of FPS – one that immersed the player in worlds primed with all manner of interactivity, rather than claustrophobic corridors, and starred a steroid-chomping muscle-bound hero who sprayed quips as quick as bullets. Moreover, the game was a brilliant parody of the genre it existed in. Duke was a machismo videogame hero, the likes of which no one had ever quite seen before. He was a one-man army with more muscles than brain cells. And the irony was that the success of the series rested firmly on his shoulders. Had 3D Realms opted to go down the safer option and cast us in the driving seat, we suspect the game would’ve been swallowed up by the 3D models of Quake and Unreal quicker than you could say ‘shake it, baby’.
While most people remember Duke for his first 3D outing on the PC, Duke Nukem actually started life in a 1991 2D platform shooter by Apogee Software (the shareware company that helped push Wolfenstein 3D and Doom out to the masses in id’s fledgling days). Originally, Duke wasn’t as arrogant as he was in his 3D days. He didn’t wear his iconic shades, he looked a bit like Flash Gordon, and his actions were far less irreverent. Also, due to some early copyright befuddlement – Apogee thought the name Duke Nukem had already been trademarked – Duke was originally christened ‘Duke Nukum’ before it was changed in Duke Nukem II. When 3D Realms, an arm of Apogee Software, saw the plaudits being picked up by Doom and Quake, they sought to use their experience within the FPS genre to release a new type of dota 2 heroes guide game onto the market, and dusted off Duke to play the hero because ‘the name rhymed and nuking things sounded cool’, or so the story goes.
For Duke’s first 3D foray, the decision was made late in the game’s development to ply it with excess, and irreverent humor. Duke’s persona was influenced by two iconic stars of the big screen: John Wayne and Clint Eastwood. His physical appearance, however, was more akin to Arnold Schwarzenegger or Dolph Lundgren. It was Nukem’s repertoire of audible quips and catchphrases that best showed his wide range of cinematic influences and became the most effective way to express his characteristics in the absence of an in-game visual presence. Memorable lines like “It’s time to kick ass and chew bubble gum and I’m all outta gum” (taken from They Live) or “Hail to the king, baby” (Army Of Darkness) drew on a rich history of cult action heroes and established Duke among the ranks of B-movie greats like Rowdy Roddy Piper and Bruce Campbell.
Over the years, Duke’s immeasurable ego and popularity has seen him appear in over 18 games and expansion packs. But despite the many console side projects and add-ons, fans are still waiting patiently for the official follow-up to Duke Nukem 3D. The aptly titled Duke Nukem Forever may never actually be released, after 12 years in development hell. Several teaser trailers have led us to expect an even more tongue-in-cheek pastiche of the muscle-bound Eighties action hero, and lord knows we need one. In 2009 it seems the FPS hero falls into either the generic ‘Doom guy’ mould or the more realistic but less fun template set out by Gordon Freeman. Such characters have their place of course, but in a genre that is first and foremost about shooting everything in sight, we sometimes yearn for a man who’s simply prepared to “make those alien bastards pay”.